So here we go...
Earlier this week I ordered the fan, the controller, the temp sensor, and the wiring harness recommended by Steel City. His legwork is first rate.
In preparation for the install, I wanted to get a baseline on the current airflow from the 500. I've never done this before, but after some research I picked up this anemometer from Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07J64TCBQ?tag=wranglerorg-20
As a general approach, you use the anemometer to take airflow measurements in feet per minute at multiple spots across the radiator airflow. Calculate the average, and then multiply that average by the area of the radiator core in square feet. That calculation gives your CMF - Cubic Feet Per Minute.
(There are several knowledgeable HVAC guys on the forum, and if anyone can correct my method here, please do).
So, I set up a test to get my baseline. First, I created a grid to collect 12 fpm measurements at consistent locations across the radiator.
View attachment 703511
Ideally, you place the anemometer between the grille and the radiator to get the most accurate result. But since I run the A/C condenser, a power steering cooler, and a transmission cooler in that space, there is absolutely no room to get the anemometer in there - so I had to do the next best thing:
View attachment 703512
I ran the first set of number with the rig cold, the hood closed, and the fan on blast (I have an override switch which allows me to do that easily).
Next, I threw on my newly acquired exhaust hose and ran the numbers again with the engine running at idle, at operating temperature, hood closed, and the fan once again on blast.
View attachment 703513
And after all that, these are my results:
View attachment 703514
With the engine off and cold, the fan pulled a calculated 1,317.88 CFM. With the engine running the fan pulled a calculated 1,427.57 CFM.
The 500 is rated for a hell of a lot more CFM than that, but that rating is without all of my crap (read: restriction/load) in front of the fan. So, I'm not surprised by the numbers.
I performed the tests a few times, and the results we spot on consistent, so I'm comfortable that I have some good numbers, and a methodology, to test the 850 once I get it installed.
It should be an interesting comparison.