Ordered a transfer case shifter kit from Savvy. No communication from them, no reply to emails or texts. Phone calls not answered, voicemail box full.
Cancel the order and go with Novak or…?
I just returned one so maybe your order will get filled
Ordered a transfer case shifter kit from Savvy. No communication from them, no reply to emails or texts. Phone calls not answered, voicemail box full.
Cancel the order and go with Novak or…?
Savvy is a rip off of Novak’s design with a slightly different mounting bracket.
The big problem with Novak is they will respond….who needs that silliness.
So irritating. Savvy sold Novak kits that they modified and didn't even tell Novak. Savvy demanded changes to the Novak kit which they were selling and Novak didn't want to make changes so Savvy made the changes and started branding the kit as their own. There is absolutely no doubt that Savvy used to sell Novak kits before they had their own. There is no doubt that Novak gave no permission for Savvy to change the design. Novak was first to sell the cable shifter. Novak did not licence or otherwise approve of the Savvy design. Novak to this day feels that Savvy has ripped their design like a cheap Chinese knock-off. Sure, they made "improvements" but you can't just say "they don't sell me enough" or "they don't make the changes I want" and justify stealing the design.
That's free market capitalism at work.
Ordered a transfer case shifter kit from Savvy. No communication from them, no reply to emails or texts. Phone calls not answered, voicemail box full.
Cancel the order and go with Novak or…?
That's free market capitalism at work.
Capitalism doesn't support theft.
Capitalism doesn't support theft.
It's just laws and lawyers, I think the story should be told as it happened so people know who they are dealing with.
Did Blaine tell the wrong story?
If you want to buy a Savvy shifter, camp out on Amazon until they say its in stock then order it immediately. That's what I did, and it showed up quickly. Here's the link, it is currently OOS: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B073L4L4R5/?tag=wranglerorg-20
I have no personal experience dealing with Savvy directly - but I do agree that in 2022, their customer service could be better from everything I'm hearing. Automated status emails (NEVER texts) are an easy thing....
I can't see what he posted on this thread and I haven't checked but what I posted is exactly how he has described it in the past. He has suggested Savvy was justified because Novak could not provide enough product and refused to make the changes suggested. I don't think they had to change but obviously opinions vary. I quoted the post I had issues with, beyond that I have no interest in tracking down people that block and hide. Are you disputing the story? I'd enjoy hearing another perspective. We can always ask Novak (again).
What he posted here earlier is consistent with what he has been saying for years. Your version is full of your own projections.
So irritating. Savvy sold Novak kits that they modified and didn't even tell Novak. Savvy demanded changes to the Novak kit which they were selling and Novak didn't want to make changes so Savvy made the changes and started branding the kit as their own. There is absolutely no doubt that Savvy used to sell Novak kits before they had their own. There is no doubt that Novak gave no permission for Savvy to change the design. Novak was first to sell the cable shifter. Novak did not licence or otherwise approve of the Savvy design. Novak to this day feels that Savvy has ripped their design like a cheap Chinese knock-off. Sure, they made "improvements" but you can't just say "they don't sell me enough" or "they don't make the changes I want" and justify stealing the design.
That's fine, I'm just going on what he has posted and what Novak has said. You can find it all for yourself. I don't sell anything here. The fact that Novak sold the cable shifter before Savvy isn't a projection, it's a fact.
Yes and so does B&M, which I just learned last night. But from what I have read about Steinjager they're in 3rd place behind Savvy and Novak. I dunno anything about B&M's yet.
Capitalism doesn't support theft.
It also doesn't support stupidity. If, and I repeat *if*, the Savvy design is better than Novak's - AND - Novak was offered the improvements and they declined; Savvy is free to sell all they can make as far as I'm concerned. I don't have a dog in this fight, but that's my viewpoint based on what I can "see from here".